Quantum Classical Synergy for Fraud Detection

International Journal of Emerging Research in Science, Engineering, and Management
Vol. 2, Issue 3, pp. 327-333, March 2026.

https://doi.org/10.58482/ijersem.v2i3.42

Quantum Classical Synergy for Fraud Detection

P Karthikeyan

N Babu

K Lakshmi Pathi

P Teja

M Yeshwanth

K Vishnu Vardhan

1Assistant Professor, Department of CSE, Siddharth Institute of Engineering & Technology, Puttur, AP, India.

2Associate Professor, Department of CSE, Siddharth Institute of Engineering & Technology, Puttur, AP, India.

3-6 UG Scholar, Department of CSE, Siddharth Institute of Engineering & Technology, Puttur, AP, India.

Abstract: Detecting fraudulent financial transactions is inherently challenging due to extreme class imbalance, complex high- dimensional feature spaces, and the adaptive strategies employed by fraudsters. To overcome these limitations, this work presents a hybrid quantum–classical fraud detection framework that strategically combines conventional machine learning models with quantum computing techniques to enhance predictive reliability. Rich feature representations are constructed by integrating transactional, behavioral, and graph-based attributes to capture both local and relational fraud characteristics. A Quantum Autoencoder (QAE) is utilized to perform efficient dimensionality reduction, enabling compact feature encoding while retaining essential discriminatory patterns. The reduced feature set is subsequently processed using Cat-Boost, alongside Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) or Variation Quantum Classifiers (VQCs) to leverage complementary learning capabilities. Model outputs are aggregated through a stacking-based meta- classification strategy, resulting in improved generalization and decision stability. Performance evaluation is carried out using fraud-oriented metrics, including recall, precision, accuracy, and false positive rate. Experimental analysis indicates that the proposed hybrid approach consistently surpasses standalone classical and quantum models, achieving superior fraud recall with notably fewer false alarms. These results demonstrate the robustness, scalability, and practical viability of quantum–classical integration, positioning the proposed framework as a promising foundation for next- generation financial fraud detection systems.

Keywords: Quantum–classical hybrid computing, financial fraud detection, Quantum auto-encoder, Variant quantum classifier, Quantum neural networks.

References: 

  1. G W. Hilal, S. A. Gadsden, and J. Yawney, “Financial Fraud: A review of anomaly detection techniques and recent advances,” Expert Systems With Applications, vol. 193, p. 116429, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116429.
  2. M. Schuld, I. Sinayskiy, and F. Petruccione, “An introduction to quantum machine learning,” Contemporary Physics, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 172–185, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1080/00107514.2014.964942.
  3. E. A. L. M. Btoush, X. Zhou, R. Gururajan, K. C. Chan, and O. Alsodi, “Enhancing credit card fraud detection with a stacking-based hybrid machine learning approach,” PeerJ Computer Science, vol. 11, p. e3007, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.3007.
  4. P. Rebentrost, M. Mohseni, and S. Lloyd, “Quantum Support vector machine for big data classification,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 113, no. 13, p. 130503, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.113.130503.
  5. D. Rayappan, “Financial fraud detection using AI, blockchain and quantum Techniques: an integrated security framework,” Dec. 25, 2025. https://spast.org/techrep/article/view/5798
  6. A. V. Dorogush, V. Ershov, and A. Gulin, “CatBoost: gradient boosting with categorical features support,” arXiv.org, Oct. 24, 2018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.11363
  7. G. Gupta, M. Kshirsagar, M. Zhong, S. Gholami, and J. L. Ferres, “Comparing recurrent convolutional neural networks for large scale bird species classification,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 17085, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96446-w.
  8. V. Havlíček et al., “Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces,” Nature, vol. 567, no. 7747, pp. 209–212, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0980-2.
  9. K. Zaman, A. Marchisio, M. A. Hanif, and M. Shafique, “A survey on quantum machine learning: current trends, challenges, opportunities, and the road ahead,” arXiv.org, Oct. 16, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.10315
  10. A. Kotiyal et al., “Graph-Based Machine Learning Approaches for Fraud Detection in Financial Networks,” 2024 7th International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I), Greater Noida, India, 2024, pp. 1714-1720, doi: 10.1109/IC3I61595.2024.10828743.
  11. Y. Du et al., “Quantum Machine Learning: A hands-on tutorial for machine learning practitioners and researchers,” arXiv.org, Feb. 03, 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.01146
  12. M. Grossi et al., “Mixed Quantum–Classical method for fraud detection with quantum feature selection,” IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 1–12, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1109/tqe.2022.3213474.