Noisy HQNNs: A Comprehensive Analysis of Noise Robustness and Noise Mitigation in Hybrid Quantum Neural Networks

International Journal of Emerging Research in Science, Engineering, and Management
Vol. 2, Issue 4, pp. 73-83, April 2026.

https://doi.org/10.58482/ijersem.v2i4.10

Noisy HQNNs: A Comprehensive Analysis of Noise Robustness and Noise Mitigation in Hybrid Quantum Neural Networks

R. G. Kumar

A. Gokul Sai

T. Durga Prasad

R. Deepika

A. Balu

1Professor, Department of CSE, Siddarth Institute of Engineering & Technology, Puttur, India.

2-5UG Scholar, Department of CSE, Siddarth Institute of Engineering & Technology, Puttur, India.

Abstract: This work focuses on the design and evaluation of Hybrid Quantum Neural Networks (HQNNs) that integrate the computational advantages of quantum circuits with the learning flexibility of classical deep neural networks to enhance machine learning performance in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era. The study investigates two prominent HQNN architectures, namely Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks (QCNNs) and Quanvolutional Neural Networks (QuanNNs), with an emphasis on their robustness under realistic quantum noise conditions. It was evaluated using image classification tasks. Under various quantum noise channels, including Bit Flip, Phase Flip, Phase Damping, Amplitude Damping, and Depolarizing Noise, were introduced to reflect realistic hardware conditions. To reduce noise-induced performance loss, error mitigation techniques such as Zero-Noise Extrapolation, Probabilistic Error Cancellation, and Measurement Error Mitigation were applied. In addition, an AI-assisted adaptive framework is proposed to automatically recommend suitable mitigation strategies based on observed noise behavior and circuit characteristics. Experimental results indicate that QuanNN exhibits strong robustness under low-to-moderate noise levels and maintains stable performance even under high bit-flip noise, while QCNN demonstrates occasional performance gains under specific noisy configurations but degrades more rapidly as noise intensity increases. The proposed AI-guided mitigation mechanism further enhances model stability across varying noise regimes. This study provides practical insights into architecture selection, noise resilience, and intelligent error mitigation integration, offering a scalable framework for deploying HQNNs in real-world NISQ-era quantum machine learning applications.

Keywords: Hybrid Quantum Neural Networks, QCNN, QuanNN, NISQ devices, Quantum Noise.

References: 

  1. J. Zhang et al., “Denoising diffusion models with optimized quantum implicit neural networks for image generation,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 173, p. 107875, May 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2025.107875.
  2. A. I. Alfajri, T. Sumaryada, S. Yani, D. T. Tai, N. Tamam, and A. Sulieman, “Hybrid quantum-classical convolutional neural networks for multiclass lung X-ray image classification,” Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 102165, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.jrras.2026.102165.
  3. K. L. Soon and L. T. Soon, “A hybrid quantum neural network and classical gated recurrent unit for battery state of health forecasting incorporating SHAP analysis,” Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 136, p. 118596, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.est.2025.118596.
  4. Q. Wu, W. Liu, X. Li, Z. Su, and J. Lei, “A multi-topology quantum convolutional neural network with qubit-measurement attention for image classification,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 160, p. 111705, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111705.
  5. Y. Li et al., “Quantum splitting convolutional neural network-based distributed quantum disease detection model,” Neurocomputing, vol. 655, p. 131410, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2025.131410.
  6. Y. Chen and W. Fang, “Multi-scale feature fusion quantum depthwise Convolutional Neural Networks for text classification,” Engineering Analysis With Boundary Elements, vol. 174, p. 106158, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2025.106158.
  7. Y. Sun et al., “Scalable quantum convolutional neural network for image classification,” Physica a Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, vol. 657, p. 130226, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2024.130226.
  8. H. Mewada, I. M. Pires, M. Rahevar, and N. Khatri, “Quantum Convolutional Neural Network for Bone Fracture Classification from X-Ray Images,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 256, pp. 1143–1150, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2025.02.222.
  9. A. Sagingalieva, L. Lusnig, F. Cavalli, and A. Melnikov, “Hybrid quantum neural networks for computer-aided sex diagnosis in forensic and physical anthropology,” Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, vol. 58, p. 101682, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2025.101682.
  10. K. Rajkumar and S. M. Shalinie, “SHAP-based intrusion detection in IoT networks using quantum neural networks on IonQ hardware,” Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, vol. 204, p. 105133, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jpdc.2025.105133.
  11. M. Srinivasulu, M. Prasad, M. Elangovan, and P. S. Geetha, “Mitigating ransomware threats through network traffic analysis using hybrid quantum-attention stereoscopic neural networks,” Neurocomputing, vol. 671, p. 132524, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2025.132524.
  12. H. N. Mahendra, V. Pushpalatha, S. Mallikarjunaswamy, S. R. Subramoniam, and J. Praveen, “Quantum convolutional neural network-based hybrid network for remote sensing image classification,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 164, p. 113195, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2025.113195.